CatBanter - View Single Post

**Dutch**

"Char" wrote in message
news

On 6/17/2011 9:20 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
On Jun 17, 6:28 am, wrote:
On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400,
wrote:
On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400,
wrote:
On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote:
Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is
what's in the can,
because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and
flocks of
livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used
for pet food:
"It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo
"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo
and so believes labels saying things like the following really do
represent
what's inside:
cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey
medley,
porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye
steak, steak
florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast
turkey, new
york strip, filet mignon
The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he
feels certain
animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much
afraid to say
what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed
it down to him
pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the
labels on the
cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid
to say that's
what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to
the conclusion
that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure
out why
rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he
also can't
figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more
expensive than
a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!!
Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL.
Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!!
You can start by not cross posting it. Duh!
There's nothing wrong with cross posting.
There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts.
You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like
to believe
that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more
animals
experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe
it and so
they are opposed to it.
There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog
food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that
will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and
worse!

However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it?

Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve
years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any
other people
that clueless, they should learn the truth already.
Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How
could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you
butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks
old.

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?-

We've spent YEARS trying to convince Goobs that NO cows are being
raised for 12 years for the singular purpose of becoming pet food.

Why don't YOU try convincing him? (he's very stupid and an extremely
slow learner)

I have a life, that's why. You should try it sometime. Why do you care
what one person thinks? Does it really matter?

All you are doing is feeding the troll. That's rather stupid.

He *is* the troll.