If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:58:24 +0000, Bob Brenchley.
wrote: Look you stupid fool, my cats exist, my experience exists, my voluntary work for the CP exists. We only have your word on that, and that isn't good enough as so much of what you say flies in the face of known facts. I offered you evidence repeatedly, what more do you want? Yes, you only have my word here but you can have any evidence you want. I've got adoption contracts, my name's on the local branch newsletter, I can give you names of other members of my branch, or people whom I've been involved with in rehoming. I guess that's not evidence enough though, is it. If I'd ever been 'lying' to them or anyone else they could've 'caught me out' any time. Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed WRONG. Home checks are ALWAYS done, without fail, BEFORE cats are rehomed, though in some cases later home visits will be made to check on their progress. Note I said 'also' there. Please read what's said before you spout your nonsense. 'Home checks are ALSO done' after rehoming - so if I'd lied in my initial home visit I'd be caught out in subsequent visits. - they remain the 'property' of the CP for 6 months and can be removed at any time in that period. Cats are not considered property. I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. I give up. Believe what you want. I believe that you are either a liar, a troll, or possibly both. If you do keep cats indoors 24/7 then you are also a sick animal abuser. .... |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:48:49 +0000, Jacqueline
wrote: Cats are not considered property. I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. Actually, on closer inspection it does say 'property'. "It is agreed that the following cat/kitten, being the property of the Cats Protection League is to be adopted by the above applicant subject to the following conditions." |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:48:49 +0000, Jacqueline
wrote: Cats are not considered property. I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. Actually, on closer inspection it does say 'property'. "It is agreed that the following cat/kitten, being the property of the Cats Protection League is to be adopted by the above applicant subject to the following conditions." |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:48:49 +0000, Jacqueline
wrote: On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:58:24 +0000, Bob Brenchley. wrote: Look you stupid fool, my cats exist, my experience exists, my voluntary work for the CP exists. We only have your word on that, and that isn't good enough as so much of what you say flies in the face of known facts. I offered you evidence repeatedly, what more do you want? The truth? Yes, you only have my word here but you can have any evidence you want. I've got adoption contracts, my name's on the local branch newsletter, I can give you names of other members of my branch, or people whom I've been involved with in rehoming. I guess that's not evidence enough though, is it. The thing is that what you claim doesn't fit in with the facts. You claim you adopted normal healthy cats from Cats Protection with them knowing in advance that you were going to keep them indoors 24/7. Highly improbable. You claim that you got your cats without a home check. Impossible. You claim that CP will consider homing cats to indoor only situations. Wrong. If I'd ever been 'lying' to them or anyone else they could've 'caught me out' any time. Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed WRONG. Home checks are ALWAYS done, without fail, BEFORE cats are rehomed, though in some cases later home visits will be made to check on their progress. Note I said 'also' there. Oh good get out there Little Miss Troll. Please read what's said before you spout your nonsense. 'Home checks are ALSO done' after rehoming - so if I'd lied in my initial home visit I'd be caught out in subsequent visits. - they remain the 'property' of the CP for 6 months and can be removed at any time in that period. Cats are not considered property. I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. Cats are not considered property. I give up. Believe what you want. I believe that you are either a liar, a troll, or possibly both. If you do keep cats indoors 24/7 then you are also a sick animal abuser. ... -- Bob. Light travels faster than sound. This is why you appear bright until we hear you talk. |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:48:49 +0000, Jacqueline
wrote: On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:58:24 +0000, Bob Brenchley. wrote: Look you stupid fool, my cats exist, my experience exists, my voluntary work for the CP exists. We only have your word on that, and that isn't good enough as so much of what you say flies in the face of known facts. I offered you evidence repeatedly, what more do you want? The truth? Yes, you only have my word here but you can have any evidence you want. I've got adoption contracts, my name's on the local branch newsletter, I can give you names of other members of my branch, or people whom I've been involved with in rehoming. I guess that's not evidence enough though, is it. The thing is that what you claim doesn't fit in with the facts. You claim you adopted normal healthy cats from Cats Protection with them knowing in advance that you were going to keep them indoors 24/7. Highly improbable. You claim that you got your cats without a home check. Impossible. You claim that CP will consider homing cats to indoor only situations. Wrong. If I'd ever been 'lying' to them or anyone else they could've 'caught me out' any time. Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed WRONG. Home checks are ALWAYS done, without fail, BEFORE cats are rehomed, though in some cases later home visits will be made to check on their progress. Note I said 'also' there. Oh good get out there Little Miss Troll. Please read what's said before you spout your nonsense. 'Home checks are ALSO done' after rehoming - so if I'd lied in my initial home visit I'd be caught out in subsequent visits. - they remain the 'property' of the CP for 6 months and can be removed at any time in that period. Cats are not considered property. I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. Cats are not considered property. I give up. Believe what you want. I believe that you are either a liar, a troll, or possibly both. If you do keep cats indoors 24/7 then you are also a sick animal abuser. ... -- Bob. Light travels faster than sound. This is why you appear bright until we hear you talk. |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:48:59 +0000, Bob Brenchley.
wrote: I offered you evidence repeatedly, what more do you want? The truth? Always giiven, Yes, you only have my word here but you can have any evidence you want. I've got adoption contracts, my name's on the local branch newsletter, I can give you names of other members of my branch, or people whom I've been involved with in rehoming. I guess that's not evidence enough though, is it. The thing is that what you claim doesn't fit in with the facts. You claim you adopted normal healthy cats from Cats Protection with them knowing in advance that you were going to keep them indoors 24/7. Highly improbable. You claim that you got your cats without a home check. Impossible. Never *once* said that, please find where I did. As I said on 8th Feb (god has this really been going on for a month): "It's most certainly not a lie, two of my cats are from Cats Protection and were homed on the understanding they were indoor cats. I was vetted prior to their arrival and had check-ups afterwards." You claim that CP will consider homing cats to indoor only situations. Wrong. Sorry, but you're wrong and I know other people who've done so. If I'd ever been 'lying' to them or anyone else they could've 'caught me out' any time. Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed WRONG. Home checks are ALWAYS done, without fail, BEFORE cats are rehomed, though in some cases later home visits will be made to check on their progress. Note I said 'also' there. Oh good get out there Little Miss Troll. ?? It's no get out - you misread what I said in the first place!! I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. Cats are not considered property. Not my me, no, but that's what it said on the adoption contract. Refuting that too are we? Shall I scan it in? |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:48:59 +0000, Bob Brenchley.
wrote: I offered you evidence repeatedly, what more do you want? The truth? Always giiven, Yes, you only have my word here but you can have any evidence you want. I've got adoption contracts, my name's on the local branch newsletter, I can give you names of other members of my branch, or people whom I've been involved with in rehoming. I guess that's not evidence enough though, is it. The thing is that what you claim doesn't fit in with the facts. You claim you adopted normal healthy cats from Cats Protection with them knowing in advance that you were going to keep them indoors 24/7. Highly improbable. You claim that you got your cats without a home check. Impossible. Never *once* said that, please find where I did. As I said on 8th Feb (god has this really been going on for a month): "It's most certainly not a lie, two of my cats are from Cats Protection and were homed on the understanding they were indoor cats. I was vetted prior to their arrival and had check-ups afterwards." You claim that CP will consider homing cats to indoor only situations. Wrong. Sorry, but you're wrong and I know other people who've done so. If I'd ever been 'lying' to them or anyone else they could've 'caught me out' any time. Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed WRONG. Home checks are ALWAYS done, without fail, BEFORE cats are rehomed, though in some cases later home visits will be made to check on their progress. Note I said 'also' there. Oh good get out there Little Miss Troll. ?? It's no get out - you misread what I said in the first place!! I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. Cats are not considered property. Not my me, no, but that's what it said on the adoption contract. Refuting that too are we? Shall I scan it in? |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:38:11 +0000, Jacqueline
wrote: On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:48:59 +0000, Bob Brenchley. wrote: I offered you evidence repeatedly, what more do you want? The truth? Always giiven, Not from you. Yes, you only have my word here but you can have any evidence you want. I've got adoption contracts, my name's on the local branch newsletter, I can give you names of other members of my branch, or people whom I've been involved with in rehoming. I guess that's not evidence enough though, is it. The thing is that what you claim doesn't fit in with the facts. You claim you adopted normal healthy cats from Cats Protection with them knowing in advance that you were going to keep them indoors 24/7. Highly improbable. You claim that you got your cats without a home check. Impossible. Never *once* said that, please find where I did. You claimed "Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed" trying to insinuate that home checks were not done BEFORE homing. Glad to see you back-tracked on that. As I said on 8th Feb (god has this really been going on for a month): "It's most certainly not a lie, two of my cats are from Cats Protection and were homed on the understanding they were indoor cats. I was vetted prior to their arrival and had check-ups afterwards." You claim that CP will consider homing cats to indoor only situations. Wrong. Sorry, but you're wrong and I know other people who've done so. Wrong. CP do not home healthy cats to indoor only situations except as a matter of last resort. I can't remember the last time I came across such a last resort, for you to claim multiple cats who are all in homes of last resort is unbelievable. If I'd ever been 'lying' to them or anyone else they could've 'caught me out' any time. Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed WRONG. Home checks are ALWAYS done, without fail, BEFORE cats are rehomed, though in some cases later home visits will be made to check on their progress. Note I said 'also' there. Oh good get out there Little Miss Troll. ?? It's no get out - you misread what I said in the first place!! Your tried, you failed. I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. Cats are not considered property. Not my me, no, but that's what it said on the adoption contract. Refuting that too are we? Shall I scan it in? Cats are not considered property. -- Bob. You have not been charged for this lesson. Please pass it to all your friends so they may learn as well. |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:38:11 +0000, Jacqueline
wrote: On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:48:59 +0000, Bob Brenchley. wrote: I offered you evidence repeatedly, what more do you want? The truth? Always giiven, Not from you. Yes, you only have my word here but you can have any evidence you want. I've got adoption contracts, my name's on the local branch newsletter, I can give you names of other members of my branch, or people whom I've been involved with in rehoming. I guess that's not evidence enough though, is it. The thing is that what you claim doesn't fit in with the facts. You claim you adopted normal healthy cats from Cats Protection with them knowing in advance that you were going to keep them indoors 24/7. Highly improbable. You claim that you got your cats without a home check. Impossible. Never *once* said that, please find where I did. You claimed "Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed" trying to insinuate that home checks were not done BEFORE homing. Glad to see you back-tracked on that. As I said on 8th Feb (god has this really been going on for a month): "It's most certainly not a lie, two of my cats are from Cats Protection and were homed on the understanding they were indoor cats. I was vetted prior to their arrival and had check-ups afterwards." You claim that CP will consider homing cats to indoor only situations. Wrong. Sorry, but you're wrong and I know other people who've done so. Wrong. CP do not home healthy cats to indoor only situations except as a matter of last resort. I can't remember the last time I came across such a last resort, for you to claim multiple cats who are all in homes of last resort is unbelievable. If I'd ever been 'lying' to them or anyone else they could've 'caught me out' any time. Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed WRONG. Home checks are ALWAYS done, without fail, BEFORE cats are rehomed, though in some cases later home visits will be made to check on their progress. Note I said 'also' there. Oh good get out there Little Miss Troll. ?? It's no get out - you misread what I said in the first place!! Your tried, you failed. I agree, but that's what was implied on the contract I had to sign. I may still have it kicking around somewhere... Here we a It says I only accept the cat/kitten for a trial period of 6 months. Should I be unable to keep it for any reason it must be returned to CP without me offering it to anyone else. In effect, it's their property. Cats are not considered property. Not my me, no, but that's what it said on the adoption contract. Refuting that too are we? Shall I scan it in? Cats are not considered property. -- Bob. You have not been charged for this lesson. Please pass it to all your friends so they may learn as well. |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 11:20:37 +0000, Bob Brenchley.
wrote: You claim that you got your cats without a home check. Impossible. Never *once* said that, please find where I did. You claimed "Home checks are also done *after* cats have been rehomed" trying to insinuate that home checks were not done BEFORE homing. Glad to see you back-tracked on that. Are you blind? Note the inclusion of the word 'also' in that sentence. ALSO done afterwards i.e. in addition to prior checks. You really are nit-picking now. Sorry, but you're wrong and I know other people who've done so. Wrong. CP do not home healthy cats to indoor only situations except as a matter of last resort. I can't remember the last time I came across such a last resort, for you to claim multiple cats who are all in homes of last resort is unbelievable. Oh for heaven's sake. I've offered you proof, I ask you AGAIN, what evidence do you want? Cats are not considered property. Not my me, no, but that's what it said on the adoption contract. Refuting that too are we? Shall I scan it in? Cats are not considered property. By whom? Not by me, by the CP, whom we were dicussing. I ask you AGAIN, do you want a copy of the CP's literature? I'll scan it in for you. You're impossible to have a two-way conversation with, how on earth can anyone discuss anything if you insist you're right and anyone who disagrees is wrong and must be trolling. One can only assume you get some weird kick out of this. Sad. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Human health risks w/ cat pooping in crawl space? | Hank | Cat health & behaviour | 10 | October 28th 03 11:45 AM |
[catslaves] - Photo Space | Yowie | Cat anecdotes | 11 | October 2nd 03 10:13 AM |