If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
In , on 10/16/03
at 04:56 PM, Elvis Parsely said: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:22:40 GMT, , wrote: In ington.edu, on 10/14/03 at 01:04 PM, Sharon Talbert said: I am afraid I don't see the problem. I am always thrilled when I discover someone has taken home a homeless cat or kitten. Not that I would leave a half-dead momcat and her kitten outside in the first place. (But that is perhaps another conversation.) The animal control office and the shelter I was working with doesn't sure your thinking. BTW, these cats were not homeless; they were sheltered, during the day and the night, fed and given attention -- by me and the kids and their parents across the street. It was the bimbo next door who did nothing for them -- and who the cats ran from -- that decided they had to go. Was the bimbo the supposed owner of the cats? Do you call her bimbo because of her sexual behavior or because you don't like her for some other reason? And this bimbo question is related to what? The owner is unknown. The momcat is stray with a kitten I was caring for -- Without discussion, consideration or any concern for the cats, the bimbo assisted someone in taking them from a place where they were being fed, were secure, had people who cared about them, had people working to socialized them, and where other cats have survived for years. -- The momcat was spotted a couple of nights ago headed down a road towards a busy US highway, probably trying to find her way home -- as she has been on several occasions before she and the kitten were taken. -- Get what is happening here? Use the word jackass if you don't like bimbo. Jade PS: Her roommate got so ****ed over this, that she is moving out tonight. Connect the dots! |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Really? You mean I could come to Seattle and take a couple of your "campus cats" without speaking to their cargegiver and you would be "thrilled"? What kind of a "friend" are you? Actually, we've had a couple of happy instances where a feral cat that socialized over time was gathered up and taken home by its favorite person, to live in happy retirement. Campus Cats was estatic, and paid stiff vet bills to be sure the cats were in reasonable condition. Would you adopt out one of your socialized cats to a couple who lived in a small trailer with four other cats? I doubt I would adopt to you. Nor would I leave a tame and ill cat and her kitten outside while I fiddled around "socializing" them. Have a nice day. Sharon Talbert Friends of Campus Cats |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
In ngton.edu, on 10/16/03
at 04:44 PM, Sharon Talbert said: Really? You mean I could come to Seattle and take a couple of your "campus cats" without speaking to their cargegiver and you would be "thrilled"? What kind of a "friend" are you? Actually, we've had a couple of happy instances where a feral cat that socialized over time was gathered up and taken home by its favorite person, to live in happy retirement. Campus Cats was estatic, and paid stiff vet bills to be sure the cats were in reasonable condition. This is not one of those happy instances. The process was cut short by be someone else. In this case the momcat was seen walking down the side of busy hightway in the rain a few nights ago. -- Smoke on that one! Would you adopt out one of your socialized cats to a couple who lived in a small trailer with four other cats? I doubt I would adopt to you. Nor would I leave a tame and ill cat and her kitten outside while I fiddled around "socializing" them. Who said the momcat was tame? -- You keep reading things that are not there, were not implied, and are not correct. -- It colors your thinking until you have no idea what you are talking about. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
In , on 10/17/03
at 12:36 PM, Elvis Parsely said: On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:54:54 GMT, , wrote: In , on 10/16/03 at 04:56 PM, Elvis Parsely said: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:22:40 GMT, , wrote: In ington.edu, on 10/14/03 at 01:04 PM, Sharon Talbert said: I am afraid I don't see the problem. I am always thrilled when I discover someone has taken home a homeless cat or kitten. Not that I would leave a half-dead momcat and her kitten outside in the first place. (But that is perhaps another conversation.) The animal control office and the shelter I was working with doesn't sure your thinking. BTW, these cats were not homeless; they were sheltered, during the day and the night, fed and given attention -- by me and the kids and their parents across the street. It was the bimbo next door who did nothing for them -- and who the cats ran from -- that decided they had to go. Was the bimbo the supposed owner of the cats? Do you call her bimbo because of her sexual behavior or because you don't like her for some other reason? And this bimbo question is related to what? The owner is unknown. The momcat is stray with a kitten I was caring for -- Without discussion, consideration or any concern for the cats, the bimbo assisted someone in taking them from a place where they were being fed, were secure, had people who cared about them, had people working to socialized them, and where other cats have survived for years. -- The momcat was spotted a couple of nights ago headed down a road towards a busy US highway, probably trying to find her way home -- as she has been on several occasions before she and the kitten were taken. -- Get what is happening here? Use the word jackass if you don't like bimbo. It might be your writing style, but I'm afraid I'm just not understanding the situation here. (Other than some stray cats were taken somewhere and you're really angry about it) I asked about Bimbo because I wanted to discern the source of your anger toward this person. See took cats I was caring for and she was not involved in. -- What part of that that is beyond your understanding? Or do you think stray cats are just there for the taking? My best guess is it sounds like there was a major lack of communication between all parties and that resulted in an action taken that might not have been best for the cats. I'd say communication now might resolve the problem. But again, I'm not sure I'm understanding you. There is more then misunderstanding. There is a complete lack of ethics on her part. She took cats she was not caring for. There is placing cats in home the humane society would not approve of (and they told me that), there is the issue of that cat roaming at night on a highway tying to find home -- not to mention the Fisher cats that are in this area praying of small game and pet cats. I'm sorry but there are whole lot of people around this list that are out of touch with reality. Jade Jade PS: Her roommate got so ****ed over this, that she is moving out tonight. Connect the dots! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|