If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Application "Points System"?
Does anyone know of a rescue group that uses an adoption application that is
graded on a points system? We are in the process of redoing our app because we've gotten criticism over how strict our standards are. I personally think it's because we've not communicated those standards very well to the adoptors and they have false expectations, so that's why I'm redoing things. But, those being critical have suggested using a points scoring system type of application "to take away the personal bias". I'm agreeable to using such an application if I can create one that still lets us keep our standards, but I need a jumping off point. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Could you share a link to your application so we can look at it? It's kind
of hard to give feedback on something you haven't seen. I don't think a point system takes out personal bias necessarily. Tracy Daniel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Tracy Daniel" wrote in message ... Could you share a link to your application so we can look at it? It's kind of hard to give feedback on something you haven't seen. I don't think a point system takes out personal bias necessarily. Tracy Daniel I don't have it online, but it's pretty standard with a few "trick" questions designed to elicit the truth, and we require vet references and home visits, but that's not clearly stated on the application, which is part of the problem and why I'm reworking it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Sunflower" wrote in message ... Does anyone know of a rescue group that uses an adoption application that is graded on a points system? We are in the process of redoing our app because we've gotten criticism over how strict our standards are. I personally think it's because we've not communicated those standards very well to the adoptors and they have false expectations, so that's why I'm redoing things. But, those being critical have suggested using a points scoring system type of application "to take away the personal bias". I'm agreeable to using such an application if I can create one that still lets us keep our standards, but I need a jumping off point. I'm not familiar with any points systems, but I don't think you should worry about criticism over "strict" standards. Those standards are intended to protect the cats, and some people just don't understand that. I do agree that it is important for the person who accepts the applications to be courteous and to explain the reasons why you have certain expectations, but (unless you have some very unusual questions) I would not back down simply because some people become annoyed. The fact is that shelters and rescue groups face this type of complaint on a regular basis. Some people will even imply that "any" home is "better than death," and they don't understand why there are any screening processes. I adopted Duffy from a shelter a little more than a year ago. I made my initial contact by phone after seeing him on Petfinder, then went to the shelter that afternoon. I filled out paperwork that asked questions about how I intended to care for a special needs cat, whether he would be kept indoors, needs of other cats in the household, how I would provide care in the event of emergencies, what I would do as he became older, etc. I was also asked if I would agree to unannounced inspections from shelter personnel, what my attitude is toward declawing (opposed!), *why* I wanted to adopt a special needs cat, and several other questions. I was immediately approved and was given a date to return (3 days later) after their veterinarian could examine Duffy and administer routine innoculations. All of this took a little time, but it is also a way to help in the process of learning who is really committed to the best interests of the pet. You really don't want someone who will become "all bent out of shape" if they can't simply walk in and walk out again with a pet in hand. Instead, you want someone who will offer the cat or kitten a loving home and who is willing to take the time to offer special care. This was a rather long-winded way to answer your question, and I departed completely from you query about a points system -- but I would like to strongly encourage you stick to your princples about screening potential adopters. I also think that you might find that a points system could create as many problems as it could solve. There are just so many intangibles involved in assessing potential catguardians that a points system could become too rigid. Incidentally, I can see some of my own attitude in a recent situation (*not* related to adoption) coming home to haunt me -- I reacted much too quickly when I thought questions were too personal, but you should be able to work through something like that by simply explaining the rationale behind your adoption process. MaryL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:57:13 -0600, "MaryL"
-OUT-THE-LITTER wrote: "Sunflower" wrote in message ... Does anyone know of a rescue group that uses an adoption application that is graded on a points system? We are in the process of redoing our app because we've gotten criticism over how strict our standards are. I personally think it's because we've not communicated those standards very well to the adoptors and they have false expectations, so that's why I'm redoing things. But, those being critical have suggested using a points scoring system type of application "to take away the personal bias". I'm agreeable to using such an application if I can create one that still lets us keep our standards, but I need a jumping off point. I'm not familiar with any points systems, but I don't think you should worry about criticism over "strict" standards. Those standards are intended to protect the cats, and some people just don't understand that. My reply is to appologize for the customer being upset about the standards. I then, quickly explain that the shelter's policies are in order to ensure that the animal is a good match for the adopter and that the director is the person who sets the standards. In the very rare occation where waiving the standard would make NO difference, I sometimes offer to let them talk to a supervisor. If waiving the standard would degrade the adoption process, I do not offer that as an option. If they insist, I do call a supervisor. I do agree that it is important for the person who accepts the applications to be courteous and to explain the reasons why you have certain expectations, but (unless you have some very unusual questions) I would not back down simply because some people become annoyed. The fact is that shelters and rescue groups face this type of complaint on a regular basis. Agreed. Some people will even imply that "any" home is "better than death," and they don't understand why there are any screening processes. They think that, but it is not true. A slow, painful death is worse than a quick, humane one. I adopted Duffy from a shelter a little more than a year ago. I made my initial contact by phone after seeing him on Petfinder, then went to the shelter that afternoon. I filled out paperwork that asked questions about how I intended to care for a special needs cat, whether he would be kept indoors, needs of other cats in the household, how I would provide care in the event of emergencies, what I would do as he became older, etc. I was also asked if I would agree to unannounced inspections from shelter personnel, what my attitude is toward declawing (opposed!), I believe the issue of declawing to be open to debate. I personally do not think it is cruel. Please don't get this thread off on that subject. It is like religion or politics, there will always be opposing views and both sides are convinced they are right. *why* I wanted to adopt a special needs cat, and several other questions. I was immediately approved and was given a date to return (3 days later) after their veterinarian could examine Duffy and administer routine innoculations. All of this took a little time, but it is also a way to help in the process of learning who is really committed to the best interests of the pet. You really don't want someone who will become "all bent out of shape" if they can't simply walk in and walk out again with a pet in hand. Instead, you want someone who will offer the cat or kitten a loving home and who is willing to take the time to offer special care. Come on, how long can this take? If you are unwilling to give up an hour of your time, I do not think you would make a good enough pet owner. Also, we have vet people on staff to do the final exam immediately upon adoption, five minute wait. This was a rather long-winded way to answer your question, and I departed completely from you query about a points system -- but I would like to strongly encourage you stick to your princples about screening potential adopters. I also think that you might find that a points system could create as many problems as it could solve. There are just so many intangibles involved in assessing potential catguardians that a points system could become too rigid. Agreed, very good point. Incidentally, I can see some of my own attitude in a recent situation (*not* related to adoption) coming home to haunt me -- I reacted much too quickly when I thought questions were too personal, but you should be able to work through something like that by simply explaining the rationale behind your adoption process. MaryL To be honest, some of our questions and processes are NOT rational :-) They could be done differently. But, then again, I'm not the director and he/she needs to be in charge. I will not agree with everything, but that is not disloyal, just opinion. We also telephone the landlord to get approval if you rent. That causes great termoil at times. Usually it means the person is NOT allowed a pet and lied on the application. We also require animals to be indoor pets, not outdoor. Yes, there is quite a contraversy about that, but it is the law in almost every city and town in our area. Pets must be restrained to their own yard and dogs are ment to be with people, not tied up in the back yard 24/7. That alone, is enough of a reason for it. Could you scan the application for us to see? It might help other people in their efforts. Would you like to see a scan of our application? I'd make one, if wanted. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fan wrote in message ... On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:57:13 -0600, "MaryL" -OUT-THE-LITTER wrote: Please don't get this thread off on that subject. I was only giving a run-down of some of the questions that were asked at the shelter, either on the questionnaire or in person (and I did not object to any of them). *why* I wanted to adopt a special needs cat, and several other questions. I was immediately approved and was given a date to return (3 days later) after their veterinarian could examine Duffy and administer routine innoculations. All of this took a little time, but it is also a way to help in the process of learning who is really committed to the best interests of the pet. You really don't want someone who will become "all bent out of shape" if they can't simply walk in and walk out again with a pet in hand. Instead, you want someone who will offer the cat or kitten a loving home and who is willing to take the time to offer special care. Come on, how long can this take? If you are unwilling to give up an hour of your time, I do not think you would make a good enough pet owner. Also, we have vet people on staff to do the final exam immediately upon adoption, five minute wait. In my case, this took quite a bit of time -- but the point I was trying to make is that shelter policies were reasonable and are designed to protect the cat. If you will re-read my message, I think you will find that I was not trying to complain about time expended. I was *defending* the shelter's screening process, not challenging it. Now, how could it have taken so much time in my case? You are correct that I did not need much time at the shelter (possibly 45 minutes the first time and much less the second time -- but much of that time was actually spent holding and petting Duffy, not undergoing an interview process). However, I adopted Duffy after I saw his picture on Petfinder and realized that he had been at the shelter for 3 months. The shelter is close enough that they will adopt to people in my community, but it is not the local shelter. The drive to the shelter was a little more than an hour, another hour to return home, then repeat that when I went back to pick him up 3 days later. But, again, please notice that this is *not* a complaint -- I was trying to say that the extra time spent was something that anyone who is serious about adopting a pet should be willing to commit to the adoption process. MaryL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:05:27 GMT, "Sunflower"
wrote: Does anyone know of a rescue group that uses an adoption application that is graded on a points system? We are in the process of redoing our app because we've gotten criticism over how strict our standards are. I personally think it's because we've not communicated those standards very well to the adoptors and they have false expectations, so that's why I'm redoing things. But, those being critical have suggested using a points scoring system type of application "to take away the personal bias". I'm agreeable to using such an application if I can create one that still lets us keep our standards, but I need a jumping off point. I have one on my computer that uses a point system, and it looks like I got it from he http://www.petrescue.com Hope that works for you. If not, let me know, and I can e-mail you a copy. Ginger-lyn |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I just visited www.petrescue.com and was impressed! They use a point system during their phone screening. They also have good guidelines for screening. Sharon Talbert Friends of Campus Cats |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Sharon Talbert" wrote in message ashington.edu... I just visited www.petrescue.com and was impressed! They use a point system during their phone screening. They also have good guidelines for screening. Sharon Talbert Friends of Campus Cats Yes, many thanks for that link! It provided a jumping off point and some ideas that I'm currently working on. First draft looks good and I'm taking it to a get together tonight for suggestions and comments. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|