If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Join PetRights.org
Perhaps this group also taught you your fine command of the English language?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Perhaps this group also taught you your fine command of the English language?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
1. PetRights.org does not support local laws requiring spaying and neutering
of pets to control overpopulation. 2. PetRights.org does not support the positions held by some animal rights groups that spaying and neutering is a humane way to prevent pet overpopulation. We also believe that it is unethical to try to control pet behavior by amputating their reproductive organs. 3. PetRights.org is opposed to other forms of pet mutilation such as declawing, debarking, ear cropping, and tail docking, and we also oppose the "euthanization" (killing) of unwanted pets that occurs in animal shelters because of lack of space and funding. 4. PetRights.org supports laws protecting household pets that would forbid spaying, neutering, declawing, debarking, ear cropping, tail docking, and other forms of mutilation, except in cases of medical necessity. We also support "no kill" laws for animal shelters, along with increased funding to provide additional space and recreational opportunities in those shelters, and to build new ones. 5. As compassionate and practical alternatives to spaying and neutering, and until better and safer methods become available, PetRights.org does not object to tubal ligation and vasectomy for purposes of controlling pet overpopulation. Further, we call on drug companies to develop pet versions of implantable, injectable, and oral contraceptives so that tubal ligation and vasectomy may someday become unnecessary. Well, bless their little bleeding hearts. And that vague reference to "no kill laws" for shelters is just peachy! What an innovative idea!! Just build more, and more, and more shelters--made possible, no doubt, by the likewise-vague reference to "increased funding." It's fine to be "against" this or that. But unless you're offering a viable alternative, and a means to achieve it, all you've done is work up a nice cute smoke-blowing website. All I see is a cute website and some nice words with no substance. Oh, yes, they "call on" pharmaceutical companies to develop new drugs. I wonder how *that's* going. Think I'll "call on" them myself for a cure for cancer. Sherry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1. PetRights.org does not support local laws requiring spaying and neutering
of pets to control overpopulation. 2. PetRights.org does not support the positions held by some animal rights groups that spaying and neutering is a humane way to prevent pet overpopulation. We also believe that it is unethical to try to control pet behavior by amputating their reproductive organs. 3. PetRights.org is opposed to other forms of pet mutilation such as declawing, debarking, ear cropping, and tail docking, and we also oppose the "euthanization" (killing) of unwanted pets that occurs in animal shelters because of lack of space and funding. 4. PetRights.org supports laws protecting household pets that would forbid spaying, neutering, declawing, debarking, ear cropping, tail docking, and other forms of mutilation, except in cases of medical necessity. We also support "no kill" laws for animal shelters, along with increased funding to provide additional space and recreational opportunities in those shelters, and to build new ones. 5. As compassionate and practical alternatives to spaying and neutering, and until better and safer methods become available, PetRights.org does not object to tubal ligation and vasectomy for purposes of controlling pet overpopulation. Further, we call on drug companies to develop pet versions of implantable, injectable, and oral contraceptives so that tubal ligation and vasectomy may someday become unnecessary. Well, bless their little bleeding hearts. And that vague reference to "no kill laws" for shelters is just peachy! What an innovative idea!! Just build more, and more, and more shelters--made possible, no doubt, by the likewise-vague reference to "increased funding." It's fine to be "against" this or that. But unless you're offering a viable alternative, and a means to achieve it, all you've done is work up a nice cute smoke-blowing website. All I see is a cute website and some nice words with no substance. Oh, yes, they "call on" pharmaceutical companies to develop new drugs. I wonder how *that's* going. Think I'll "call on" them myself for a cure for cancer. Sherry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sherry wrote:
1. PetRights.org does not support local laws requiring spaying and neutering of pets to control overpopulation. 2. PetRights.org does not support the positions held by some animal rights groups that spaying and neutering is a humane way to prevent pet overpopulation. We also believe that it is unethical to try to control pet behavior by amputating their reproductive organs. 3. PetRights.org is opposed to other forms of pet mutilation such as declawing, debarking, ear cropping, and tail docking, and we also oppose the "euthanization" (killing) of unwanted pets that occurs in animal shelters because of lack of space and funding. 4. PetRights.org supports laws protecting household pets that would forbid spaying, neutering, declawing, debarking, ear cropping, tail docking, and other forms of mutilation, except in cases of medical necessity. We also support "no kill" laws for animal shelters, along with increased funding to provide additional space and recreational opportunities in those shelters, and to build new ones. 5. As compassionate and practical alternatives to spaying and neutering, and until better and safer methods become available, PetRights.org does not object to tubal ligation and vasectomy for purposes of controlling pet overpopulation. Further, we call on drug companies to develop pet versions of implantable, injectable, and oral contraceptives so that tubal ligation and vasectomy may someday become unnecessary. Well, bless their little bleeding hearts. And that vague reference to "no kill laws" for shelters is just peachy! What an innovative idea!! Just build more, and more, and more shelters--made possible, no doubt, by the likewise-vague reference to "increased funding." It's fine to be "against" this or that. But unless you're offering a viable alternative, and a means to achieve it, all you've done is work up a nice cute smoke-blowing website. All I see is a cute website and some nice words with no substance. Oh, yes, they "call on" pharmaceutical companies to develop new drugs. I wonder how *that's* going. Think I'll "call on" them myself for a cure for cancer. Sherry I looked at the website and agree with you that it sounds like they are "blowing smoke". When I get it together I intend to send them an email asking just what they do actively to make changes if anything. As to the new drugs an issue or two ago Cat Fancy made mention of a sterilization vaccine that was in development. So depending on what happens with it and the nature of it spaying and/or neutering might become unnecessary for sterilization purposes. Of course it might not solve the spraying, uterine cancer, or other health issues that are resolved currently through spaying and neutering. rrb |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sherry wrote:
1. PetRights.org does not support local laws requiring spaying and neutering of pets to control overpopulation. 2. PetRights.org does not support the positions held by some animal rights groups that spaying and neutering is a humane way to prevent pet overpopulation. We also believe that it is unethical to try to control pet behavior by amputating their reproductive organs. 3. PetRights.org is opposed to other forms of pet mutilation such as declawing, debarking, ear cropping, and tail docking, and we also oppose the "euthanization" (killing) of unwanted pets that occurs in animal shelters because of lack of space and funding. 4. PetRights.org supports laws protecting household pets that would forbid spaying, neutering, declawing, debarking, ear cropping, tail docking, and other forms of mutilation, except in cases of medical necessity. We also support "no kill" laws for animal shelters, along with increased funding to provide additional space and recreational opportunities in those shelters, and to build new ones. 5. As compassionate and practical alternatives to spaying and neutering, and until better and safer methods become available, PetRights.org does not object to tubal ligation and vasectomy for purposes of controlling pet overpopulation. Further, we call on drug companies to develop pet versions of implantable, injectable, and oral contraceptives so that tubal ligation and vasectomy may someday become unnecessary. Well, bless their little bleeding hearts. And that vague reference to "no kill laws" for shelters is just peachy! What an innovative idea!! Just build more, and more, and more shelters--made possible, no doubt, by the likewise-vague reference to "increased funding." It's fine to be "against" this or that. But unless you're offering a viable alternative, and a means to achieve it, all you've done is work up a nice cute smoke-blowing website. All I see is a cute website and some nice words with no substance. Oh, yes, they "call on" pharmaceutical companies to develop new drugs. I wonder how *that's* going. Think I'll "call on" them myself for a cure for cancer. Sherry I looked at the website and agree with you that it sounds like they are "blowing smoke". When I get it together I intend to send them an email asking just what they do actively to make changes if anything. As to the new drugs an issue or two ago Cat Fancy made mention of a sterilization vaccine that was in development. So depending on what happens with it and the nature of it spaying and/or neutering might become unnecessary for sterilization purposes. Of course it might not solve the spraying, uterine cancer, or other health issues that are resolved currently through spaying and neutering. rrb |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Rrb wrote in message ... Sherry wrote: 1. PetRights.org does not support local laws requiring spaying and neutering of pets to control overpopulation. 2. PetRights.org does not support the positions held by some animal rights groups that spaying and neutering is a humane way to prevent pet overpopulation. We also believe that it is unethical to try to control pet behavior by amputating their reproductive organs. 3. PetRights.org is opposed to other forms of pet mutilation such as declawing, debarking, ear cropping, and tail docking, and we also oppose the "euthanization" (killing) of unwanted pets that occurs in animal shelters because of lack of space and funding. 4. PetRights.org supports laws protecting household pets that would forbid spaying, neutering, declawing, debarking, ear cropping, tail docking, and other forms of mutilation, except in cases of medical necessity. We also support "no kill" laws for animal shelters, along with increased funding to provide additional space and recreational opportunities in those shelters, and to build new ones. 5. As compassionate and practical alternatives to spaying and neutering, and until better and safer methods become available, PetRights.org does not object to tubal ligation and vasectomy for purposes of controlling pet overpopulation. Further, we call on drug companies to develop pet versions of implantable, injectable, and oral contraceptives so that tubal ligation and vasectomy may someday become unnecessary. Well, bless their little bleeding hearts. And that vague reference to "no kill laws" for shelters is just peachy! What an innovative idea!! Just build more, and more, and more shelters--made possible, no doubt, by the likewise-vague reference to "increased funding." It's fine to be "against" this or that. But unless you're offering a viable alternative, and a means to achieve it, all you've done is work up a nice cute smoke-blowing website. All I see is a cute website and some nice words with no substance. Oh, yes, they "call on" pharmaceutical companies to develop new drugs. I wonder how *that's* going. Think I'll "call on" them myself for a cure for cancer. Sherry I looked at the website and agree with you that it sounds like they are "blowing smoke". When I get it together I intend to send them an email asking just what they do actively to make changes if anything. As to the new drugs an issue or two ago Cat Fancy made mention of a sterilization vaccine that was in development. So depending on what happens with it and the nature of it spaying and/or neutering might become unnecessary for sterilization purposes. Of course it might not solve the spraying, uterine cancer, or other health issues that are resolved currently through spaying and neutering. Oh do enlighten us o' wise one!! What on EARTH did these cats do when the wonderous spaying and neurtering weren't available? Really! HOW did they even manage to survive????? Start from the beginning too. (After the dinosaur period of course.) rrb |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Rrb wrote in message ... Sherry wrote: 1. PetRights.org does not support local laws requiring spaying and neutering of pets to control overpopulation. 2. PetRights.org does not support the positions held by some animal rights groups that spaying and neutering is a humane way to prevent pet overpopulation. We also believe that it is unethical to try to control pet behavior by amputating their reproductive organs. 3. PetRights.org is opposed to other forms of pet mutilation such as declawing, debarking, ear cropping, and tail docking, and we also oppose the "euthanization" (killing) of unwanted pets that occurs in animal shelters because of lack of space and funding. 4. PetRights.org supports laws protecting household pets that would forbid spaying, neutering, declawing, debarking, ear cropping, tail docking, and other forms of mutilation, except in cases of medical necessity. We also support "no kill" laws for animal shelters, along with increased funding to provide additional space and recreational opportunities in those shelters, and to build new ones. 5. As compassionate and practical alternatives to spaying and neutering, and until better and safer methods become available, PetRights.org does not object to tubal ligation and vasectomy for purposes of controlling pet overpopulation. Further, we call on drug companies to develop pet versions of implantable, injectable, and oral contraceptives so that tubal ligation and vasectomy may someday become unnecessary. Well, bless their little bleeding hearts. And that vague reference to "no kill laws" for shelters is just peachy! What an innovative idea!! Just build more, and more, and more shelters--made possible, no doubt, by the likewise-vague reference to "increased funding." It's fine to be "against" this or that. But unless you're offering a viable alternative, and a means to achieve it, all you've done is work up a nice cute smoke-blowing website. All I see is a cute website and some nice words with no substance. Oh, yes, they "call on" pharmaceutical companies to develop new drugs. I wonder how *that's* going. Think I'll "call on" them myself for a cure for cancer. Sherry I looked at the website and agree with you that it sounds like they are "blowing smoke". When I get it together I intend to send them an email asking just what they do actively to make changes if anything. As to the new drugs an issue or two ago Cat Fancy made mention of a sterilization vaccine that was in development. So depending on what happens with it and the nature of it spaying and/or neutering might become unnecessary for sterilization purposes. Of course it might not solve the spraying, uterine cancer, or other health issues that are resolved currently through spaying and neutering. Oh do enlighten us o' wise one!! What on EARTH did these cats do when the wonderous spaying and neurtering weren't available? Really! HOW did they even manage to survive????? Start from the beginning too. (After the dinosaur period of course.) rrb |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:03:33 -0700, "Electric Nachos"
wrote: How do you get through to these overgrown apes that cats do not need to be pumped up with drugs because the damn things want to pee wherever the hell it wants! Something is wrong with the cat?!? Something is wrong with an animal that does what it was naturally born to do????? Oh, now I get it........you came here to this ng because you're lonely and ****ed that none of your friends come over to visit you anymore, on account of your house stinks so bad. Were you born in a barn? -bonbon My thoughts too. The nonchalant remark about wiping up cat spray--it's no big deal? Phewwwww. I got a mental picture (and aroma) of her house.... Sherry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:03:33 -0700, "Electric Nachos"
wrote: How do you get through to these overgrown apes that cats do not need to be pumped up with drugs because the damn things want to pee wherever the hell it wants! Something is wrong with the cat?!? Something is wrong with an animal that does what it was naturally born to do????? Oh, now I get it........you came here to this ng because you're lonely and ****ed that none of your friends come over to visit you anymore, on account of your house stinks so bad. Were you born in a barn? -bonbon My thoughts too. The nonchalant remark about wiping up cat spray--it's no big deal? Phewwwww. I got a mental picture (and aroma) of her house.... Sherry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Join the Pussy Cat Revolution! | Moggins | Cat anecdotes | 7 | December 8th 04 05:50 AM |
Join the Pussy Cat Revolution! | Moggins | Cat community | 0 | December 6th 04 05:43 PM |
Cory Went to Join His Mom | MacCandace | Cat health & behaviour | 44 | April 5th 04 10:21 PM |