If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Betsy" -0 wrote in message ...
One buys premium cat food with recognizable ingredients, or else one cooks for ones cat. I've been trying to educate friends and family and whoever will listen for YEARS that mystery meats in pet food are bad news, Steve Crane & Hills to the contrary! Jean, Education is a two way street. The term "mystery" meat is simply silly. Pet foods contain what you the consumer demand to have in the food. Thus if you want chicken in the food, that's what you get. Personally I don't care what meat protein a consumer desires, they are all pretty similar in nutrient composition (lamb excepted). On the other hand the decision to use any particular ingredient is quite silly and of little value to the pet. It is the nutrients that the ingredient provide that are of critical importance. When a consumer makes a decision based on ingredients they can potentially get into trouble. Making such a decision is about on par with doing third grade math - simple addition and subtraction. Making decisions based on the *nutrients* provided in the food is stepping up to the next level of nutrition - about on par with high school calculus and trig. As long as a consumer is content with third grade elementary nutrition, and there are no disease issues to contend with, choosing a food based on ingredients works just fine. Unfortunately such choices can prove potentially disastrous. Placing a geriatric kitty of a food with "good sounding" ingredients and phosphorus levels above 1.5%, sodium levels above 1% and low levels of N-3 fatty acids could prove lethal. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
So it seems almost like we might just as well not worry about it
beyond avoiding the most obvious culprits--unless we can ensure exactly what is in our foods? -- Jean B. Probably. I mean, I'm not worried sick about it or anything but I do have a slight concern as to whether this whole thing is going to become widespread. I never feed my cats beef type food anyway; we jsut sort of decided not to when mad cow broke out in England a few years ago but I'm sure they get some beef by-products or stock in some of their foods. Just as I assume that I also do even though I'm vegetarian. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) See my cats: http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace "One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human." (Loren Eisely) |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
So it seems almost like we might just as well not worry about it
beyond avoiding the most obvious culprits--unless we can ensure exactly what is in our foods? -- Jean B. Probably. I mean, I'm not worried sick about it or anything but I do have a slight concern as to whether this whole thing is going to become widespread. I never feed my cats beef type food anyway; we jsut sort of decided not to when mad cow broke out in England a few years ago but I'm sure they get some beef by-products or stock in some of their foods. Just as I assume that I also do even though I'm vegetarian. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) See my cats: http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace "One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human." (Loren Eisely) |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
From: er (Hagar)
In article (GAUBSTER2) wrote: From: frlpwr Betsy wrote: One buys premium cat food with recognizable ingredients, Exactly right. What little regulation there is for pet foods is mostly involved with labelling. If the contents are beef, chicken, fish, whatever, the label must say so. It is the mysterious "meat by-products" that can legally contain the flesh or rendered flesh of any mammals, including mink, marine mammals, zoo animals and, as shown by some well documented instances in the past, euthanized pets. As for "well documented" instances, I'll have to disagree w/ you strongly on that one. The fact that you disagree isn't exactly PROOF of Betsy's statement, but it's certainly a good indication that she's correct. Please provide a name of a food that had dead dogs and/or cats in it. I dare you! Do your own research. We have. Gaubster doesn't do research. He's a troll that just makes inflammatory remarks. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Cat Food and Mad Cow Disease
From: er (Hagar) As for "well documented" instances, I'll have to disagree w/ you strongly on that one. The fact that you disagree isn't exactly PROOF of Betsy's statement, but it's certainly a good indication that she's correct. That is so illogical, I can't believe you would even type such drivel. That's the equivilent of Betsy stating that the sun will rise tomorrow in the west. I state that I disagree and you come in and state that she must be right because I disagree? You must be embarrased! Please provide a name of a food that had dead dogs and/or cats in it. I dare you! Do your own research. We have. I asked a direct question and you can't answer it. If it happens all the time and is so common as to be a "problem", then you should have no problem rattling off a whole bunch of foods that contain dead dogs and cats. Since there are none, however, that is exactly the response I thought I would get from you! You can start he http://www.belfield.com/article3.html but since it contains statements you disagree with, you presumably won't be able to read it. That's all you got?? LOL I'll ask you AGAIN....which pet foods have dead dogs and cats in them? If you can't provide that information, it'll be apparent to everybody reading this that you are either a troll or quite mad. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Cat Food and Mad Cow Disease
From: er (Hagar) As for "well documented" instances, I'll have to disagree w/ you strongly on that one. The fact that you disagree isn't exactly PROOF of Betsy's statement, but it's certainly a good indication that she's correct. That is so illogical, I can't believe you would even type such drivel. That's the equivilent of Betsy stating that the sun will rise tomorrow in the west. I state that I disagree and you come in and state that she must be right because I disagree? You must be embarrased! Please provide a name of a food that had dead dogs and/or cats in it. I dare you! Do your own research. We have. I asked a direct question and you can't answer it. If it happens all the time and is so common as to be a "problem", then you should have no problem rattling off a whole bunch of foods that contain dead dogs and cats. Since there are none, however, that is exactly the response I thought I would get from you! You can start he http://www.belfield.com/article3.html but since it contains statements you disagree with, you presumably won't be able to read it. That's all you got?? LOL I'll ask you AGAIN....which pet foods have dead dogs and cats in them? If you can't provide that information, it'll be apparent to everybody reading this that you are either a troll or quite mad. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Crane wrote:
"Jean B." wrote in message ... So I wonder how one can avoid such foods, since all of the credible commercial foods contain byproducts? The chicken etc. still contains animal byproducts. I guess, then, that one just assumes that the likelihood of any particular cat getting TSE is extremely small, just as the chance of our getting it is small. Still, it is not a comforting thought. It seems easier for me, as a human, to avoid possibly contaminated foods than it is to protect my feline friends. Jean, Just to make sure there is no confusion here. A pet food labelled to contain "chicken by products" does NOT contain beef or other meat meals, it contains CHICKEN by-products and is therefore of no concern. The term by-products will always have a classification noun to accompany it in North America. (This is not true is Europe where pet foods may be labelled simply "meat".) For example chicken by-products, lamb by-products, or pork by-products etc. It can be generic under the legal definition "meat-by-products", which can include any mammalian source of meat protein. If your pet food contains the ingredient "chicken by-product" - it contains by-products of chicken, (usually internal organs, backs and necks) not by-products from beef or any other mammal. Yes, I do understand that.... -- Jean B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|