If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] confused and worried about dental insurance
I guess I have the problem most people only wish they had. I'm
covered by two dental insurance plans. But I'm not sure it's a good thing. See, I've been using my husband's insurance, which has pretty good coverage both in and out of network. My new company provides dental insurance for free. That should be good, right? Well, my new company's dental insurance is great for in-network stuff, but not so much out of network. And naturally the dentist I adore, and the endodontist he recommends (well, actually, as near as I can tell, all the endodontists in Boulder) are out of network. As near as I can figure by googling, your primary insurance company *must* be your employer's. That means they get the bill first. Then your secondary insurance gets the remainder, but as near as I can tell they can decide how they want to deal with that. For example, if the first company covers 40% and the second company covers 80%, the second company gets a choice of whether to cover the remaining 40% or whether they want to cover 80% of 60% (see why I'm confused?) Of course both have deductables and whatnot, and both have yearly maximums. To make this even more fun, DH is on vacation and so can't contact his HR person; my HR person is on vacation this week. I have an appt next Tuesday for attempt number 2 of a root canal. See, the endodontist couldn't find the canal last time he tried. But now the tooth has really started to hurt, so we're going to try to find the canal again. A successful root canal would be the glowingly happy and wonderful option. If that doesn't work, most likely because he accidentally pokes a hole in my tooth, I will need to get the tooth extracted and (I guess this isn't strictly speaking required, but it is as far as I'm concerned) an implant to replace it. The endo doc tells me an implant, including crown, is about $3000. Youch. But it's best to do the implant at the time of the extraction, because the hole's already there. I think the root canal is about $800; the attempt last week he only charged $100 for. But no idea what my insurance company will make of that. Oh, yes, and I don't have my new insurance company listed for them, because I didn't realize I had to. So I really hope this doesn't screw me out of benefits somehow. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
*deep breath*
Finally found DH's insurance info. I think I'll be okay. Both cover 100% of routine care, no matter whether you go in-network or not. 100% of reasonable and customary, of course. Both have the same deductable. Both cover 50% or 60% for "class C" services, which include crowns and (I think) implants, if implants are "partial, full or removable dentures." My new dental actually covers 100%/80% of "class B" (including root canals and extractions), whereas DH's covers 90%/80%. So percentage-wise the new stuff is better. But DH's annual max is $1500, vs. the $1000 for the new stuff. All of this stuff will be out of network ... so actually it's 80% regardless ... but the effective annual max of $2500 instead of $1000 will be very nice this year ... Sorry if I appear to be freaking out. My jaw hurts, DH is on a trip and hasn't answered his phone or arrived at the midway point yet (and should have, hours ago), and I'm really confused. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message
... *deep breath* Finally found DH's insurance info. I think I'll be okay. Both cover 100% of routine care, no matter whether you go in-network or not. 100% of reasonable and customary, of course. Both have the same deductable. Both cover 50% or 60% for "class C" services, which include crowns and (I think) implants, if implants are "partial, full or removable dentures." My new dental actually covers 100%/80% of "class B" (including root canals and extractions), whereas DH's covers 90%/80%. So percentage-wise the new stuff is better. But DH's annual max is $1500, vs. the $1000 for the new stuff. All of this stuff will be out of network ... so actually it's 80% regardless ... but the effective annual max of $2500 instead of $1000 will be very nice this year ... Sorry if I appear to be freaking out. My jaw hurts, DH is on a trip and hasn't answered his phone or arrived at the midway point yet (and should have, hours ago), and I'm really confused. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca I don't blame you. It's hard to figure anything out when you're in pain, and I think insurance companies try to keep us as confused as possible. Joy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:06:52 -0600, "Monique Y. Mudama"
wrote: I guess I have the problem most people only wish they had. I'm covered by two dental insurance plans. But I'm not sure it's a good thing. See, I've been using my husband's insurance, which has pretty good coverage both in and out of network. My new company provides dental insurance for free. That should be good, right? Well, my new company's dental insurance is great for in-network stuff, but not so much out of network. And naturally the dentist I adore, and the endodontist he recommends (well, actually, as near as I can tell, all the endodontists in Boulder) are out of network. As near as I can figure by googling, your primary insurance company *must* be your employer's. That means they get the bill first. Then your secondary insurance gets the remainder, but as near as I can tell they can decide how they want to deal with that. For example, if the first company covers 40% and the second company covers 80%, the second company gets a choice of whether to cover the remaining 40% or whether they want to cover 80% of 60% (see why I'm confused?) Of course both have deductables and whatnot, and both have yearly maximums. To make this even more fun, DH is on vacation and so can't contact his HR person; my HR person is on vacation this week. I have an appt next Tuesday for attempt number 2 of a root canal. See, the endodontist couldn't find the canal last time he tried. But now the tooth has really started to hurt, so we're going to try to find the canal again. A successful root canal would be the glowingly happy and wonderful option. If that doesn't work, most likely because he accidentally pokes a hole in my tooth, I will need to get the tooth extracted and (I guess this isn't strictly speaking required, but it is as far as I'm concerned) an implant to replace it. The endo doc tells me an implant, including crown, is about $3000. Youch. But it's best to do the implant at the time of the extraction, because the hole's already there. I think the root canal is about $800; the attempt last week he only charged $100 for. But no idea what my insurance company will make of that. Oh, yes, and I don't have my new insurance company listed for them, because I didn't realize I had to. So I really hope this doesn't screw me out of benefits somehow. Wow, Monique, what a maze! I hope this works out for you somehow. Personally, I think insurance companies are EVIL. Heh. But I hope having two of them makes this come together for you, and that you get the work done you need. Ginger-lyn Home Pages: http://www.spiritrealm.com/summer/ http://www.angelfire.com/folk/glsummer (homepage & cats) http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb....mmer/index.htm (genealogy) http://www.movieanimals.bravehost.com/ (The Violence Against Animals in Movies Website) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Don't have any advice to give you, but we will purr and pray that everything
works out your way. Lily & her mama Jazz, RB -- Irulan from the stars we come to the stars we return from now until the end of time "Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message ... I guess I have the problem most people only wish they had. I'm covered by two dental insurance plans. But I'm not sure it's a good thing. See, I've been using my husband's insurance, which has pretty good coverage both in and out of network. My new company provides dental insurance for free. That should be good, right? Well, my new company's dental insurance is great for in-network stuff, but not so much out of network. And naturally the dentist I adore, and the endodontist he recommends (well, actually, as near as I can tell, all the endodontists in Boulder) are out of network. As near as I can figure by googling, your primary insurance company *must* be your employer's. That means they get the bill first. Then your secondary insurance gets the remainder, but as near as I can tell they can decide how they want to deal with that. For example, if the first company covers 40% and the second company covers 80%, the second company gets a choice of whether to cover the remaining 40% or whether they want to cover 80% of 60% (see why I'm confused?) Of course both have deductables and whatnot, and both have yearly maximums. To make this even more fun, DH is on vacation and so can't contact his HR person; my HR person is on vacation this week. I have an appt next Tuesday for attempt number 2 of a root canal. See, the endodontist couldn't find the canal last time he tried. But now the tooth has really started to hurt, so we're going to try to find the canal again. A successful root canal would be the glowingly happy and wonderful option. If that doesn't work, most likely because he accidentally pokes a hole in my tooth, I will need to get the tooth extracted and (I guess this isn't strictly speaking required, but it is as far as I'm concerned) an implant to replace it. The endo doc tells me an implant, including crown, is about $3000. Youch. But it's best to do the implant at the time of the extraction, because the hole's already there. I think the root canal is about $800; the attempt last week he only charged $100 for. But no idea what my insurance company will make of that. Oh, yes, and I don't have my new insurance company listed for them, because I didn't realize I had to. So I really hope this doesn't screw me out of benefits somehow. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-07-06, Irulan penned:
Don't have any advice to give you, but we will purr and pray that everything works out your way. Lily & her mama Jazz, RB Thank you =) -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
I guess I have the problem most people only wish they had. I'm covered by two dental insurance plans. But I'm not sure it's a good thing. See, I've been using my husband's insurance, which has pretty good coverage both in and out of network. My new company provides dental insurance for free. That should be good, right? Well, my new company's dental insurance is great for in-network stuff, but not so much out of network. And naturally the dentist I adore, and the endodontist he recommends (well, actually, as near as I can tell, all the endodontists in Boulder) are out of network. As near as I can figure by googling, your primary insurance company *must* be your employer's. That means they get the bill first. Then your secondary insurance gets the remainder, but as near as I can tell they can decide how they want to deal with that. For example, if the first company covers 40% and the second company covers 80%, the second company gets a choice of whether to cover the remaining 40% or whether they want to cover 80% of 60% (see why I'm confused?) Of course both have deductables and whatnot, and both have yearly maximums. To make this even more fun, DH is on vacation and so can't contact his HR person; my HR person is on vacation this week. I have an appt next Tuesday for attempt number 2 of a root canal. In general, your insurance is primary. Then, using a clause known in the insurance industry as coordination of benefits, your husband's carrier is responsible for any charges not covered by your primary (assuming the deductible on his has been met). They don't get to pick and choose what percentage they pay out. If yours pays 80% they will pay the remaining 20%. Again, after the deductible. Jill |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-07-07, jmcquown penned:
In general, your insurance is primary. Then, using a clause known in the insurance industry as coordination of benefits, your husband's carrier is responsible for any charges not covered by your primary (assuming the deductible on his has been met). They don't get to pick and choose what percentage they pay out. If yours pays 80% they will pay the remaining 20%. Again, after the deductible. Jill Well, I found a link that says "For groups with a non-duplication of benefits rule in their plan, the secondary carrier pays only the difference between what the primary carrier actually paid and what the secondary carrier would have paid if it had been the primary carrier." http://www.deltadentalins.com/enroll..._coverage.html I don't see anything about non-dupe stuff in my paperwork, but I don't know if it would be in the overview packages. I suspect it won't matter, as the only reason this will become a real issue is if I have a lot of work done, in which case I'll hit the max payout for the first and the second will have to pay up, anyway. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
On 2005-07-07, jmcquown penned: In general, your insurance is primary. Then, using a clause known in the insurance industry as coordination of benefits, your husband's carrier is responsible for any charges not covered by your primary (assuming the deductible on his has been met). They don't get to pick and choose what percentage they pay out. If yours pays 80% they will pay the remaining 20%. Again, after the deductible. Jill Well, I found a link that says "For groups with a non-duplication of benefits rule in their plan, the secondary carrier pays only the difference between what the primary carrier actually paid and what the secondary carrier would have paid if it had been the primary carrier." That's insurance speak for they won't double-pay the provider (or reimburse you twice, if you paid out of pocket and then filed two claims in an attempt to get double reimbursement). It essentially means what I said I was a licensed insurance agent from 1984 until 1990, even though I never actually *sold* insurance. I worked for The Prudential from 1982 - 1988 and then for a third-party-claims administrator assisting brokers in selecting health and dental plans for their clients until 1990. I decided I was more interested in computers than insurance policies, but some of the information sticks http://www.deltadentalins.com/enroll..._coverage.html I don't see anything about non-dupe stuff in my paperwork, but I don't know if it would be in the overview packages. I suspect it won't matter, as the only reason this will become a real issue is if I have a lot of work done, in which case I'll hit the max payout for the first and the second will have to pay up, anyway. Yep, you should be fine Jill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|