If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#512
|
|||
|
|||
"Yngver" wrote in message ... As a fairly impartial observer, in reading through Lauren's statements in this thread I don't find evidence of untruthfulness. In this thread...? What about her conjured up, buit-to-suit stories for the last year or so...? ....from "never" feeding SD ... to "once" ... to "the only time"... to "a steady diet"... to "was raised on".... to "fed mostly".... From: Darnit7 ) Subject: Hills pet italia Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Date: 2001-02-24 18:14:03 PST message "I would never feed Hills to my pets" From: PawsForThought ) Subject: IAMS is owned by Procter and Gamble Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Date: 2002-07-31 15:46:04 PST "IMO Innova is a better choice than SD. SD uses too many chemicals in their food for my liking. I tried it once with my last cat but she threw it up. From: PawsForThought ) Subject: Dry vs. moist Science Diet cat food Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Date: 2002-08-25 14:01:11 PST "The only time I ever fed my cats Science Diet, they threw up all over the place and had diahrea. From: PawsForThought ) Subject: big improvement in CRF cat Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Date: 2003-02-08 17:56:19 PST "Secondly, my CRF cat was raised on a steady diet of 9 Lives and Science Diet." From: PawsForThought ) Subject: phosphorus content of Wellness Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Date: 2003-05-23 06:09:23 PST "I don't remember what I fed two of my cats that died from CRF because it was some time ago. But my last cat also died from CRF. I fed her mostly 9 Lives and Science Diet, ....from "never" ... to "once" ... to "the only time"... to "a steady diet"... to "was raised on".... to "fed mostly".... Nope... No evidence of untruthfulness there! ROTFL! If I'm ever on trial, I'd sure want you on my jury! LOL! |
#513
|
|||
|
|||
"Yngver" wrote in message ... I don't see evidence of a specific vendetta against Hills. Ray Charles wearing a blindfold could see it! LOL! Better stay out of Arizona... You might not see the Grand Canyon and fall into it.... |
#514
|
|||
|
|||
"Yngver" wrote in message ... I don't see evidence of a specific vendetta against Hills. Ray Charles wearing a blindfold could see it! LOL! Better stay out of Arizona... You might not see the Grand Canyon and fall into it.... |
#515
|
|||
|
|||
"Yngver" wrote in message ... I don't see evidence of a specific vendetta against Hills. Ray Charles wearing a blindfold could see it! LOL! Better stay out of Arizona... You might not see the Grand Canyon and fall into it.... |
#516
|
|||
|
|||
Yngver wrote:
(GAUBSTER2) wrote: From: ospam (Yngver) Posts that are imprecise or leave out details for brevity's sake are not the same as lying, you know. If everyone posting to ngs were perfectly clear and precise each time he/she posted, posts would be so long few people would read them. I agree. She only reaps what she sows. Oh, c'mon now. That's just plain vicious. That's not vicious, that's my opinion and the opinion of others as expressed here lately. You have a weird definition of the term, "vicious". I would actually label some of the things she has said against Phil P as being closer to "vicious". LOL. Oh, sure. Lauren was vicious to Phil P? Right. You must have missed a lot of flame wars in this ng. Lauren hates Hill's and takes every opportunity to bash away even if it means making things up. I don't see evidence of a specific vendetta against Hills. You've absolutely got to be kidding. Vendetta: an often prolonged series of retaliatory, vengeful, or hostile acts or exchange of such acts. You know, I guess you could call me anti-Tender Vittles--I think it's a terrible food--but that's not the same as a vendetta against the mfr. Lauren had a bad experience with SD. Her cat had health problems on it, and her vet advised her to quit feeding it. The cat's health improved, and the vet concluded that SD had been contributing to the problems. It's natural that if a person has a bad experience with a particular food, that she/he will view the food unfavorably. Yet the SD zealots here accuse her of lying and fabrication because she has voiced a poor opinion of SD? C'mon. Listen, I had a really bad experience with a particular cat food--after shelling out $1100 to the vet and bringing my cat home after four days in the hospital, do you suppose I would not have some hard feelings about that particular food? If that food happened to be manufactured by Hill's (it wasn't), would the Hills champions on this ng declare that I must have made it all up to support a hate campaign against the company? Apparently you can only zealously promote SD at every opportunity on this newsgroup. You cannot criticize it without these guys going through the roof... K |
#517
|
|||
|
|||
Yngver wrote:
(GAUBSTER2) wrote: From: ospam (Yngver) Posts that are imprecise or leave out details for brevity's sake are not the same as lying, you know. If everyone posting to ngs were perfectly clear and precise each time he/she posted, posts would be so long few people would read them. I agree. She only reaps what she sows. Oh, c'mon now. That's just plain vicious. That's not vicious, that's my opinion and the opinion of others as expressed here lately. You have a weird definition of the term, "vicious". I would actually label some of the things she has said against Phil P as being closer to "vicious". LOL. Oh, sure. Lauren was vicious to Phil P? Right. You must have missed a lot of flame wars in this ng. Lauren hates Hill's and takes every opportunity to bash away even if it means making things up. I don't see evidence of a specific vendetta against Hills. You've absolutely got to be kidding. Vendetta: an often prolonged series of retaliatory, vengeful, or hostile acts or exchange of such acts. You know, I guess you could call me anti-Tender Vittles--I think it's a terrible food--but that's not the same as a vendetta against the mfr. Lauren had a bad experience with SD. Her cat had health problems on it, and her vet advised her to quit feeding it. The cat's health improved, and the vet concluded that SD had been contributing to the problems. It's natural that if a person has a bad experience with a particular food, that she/he will view the food unfavorably. Yet the SD zealots here accuse her of lying and fabrication because she has voiced a poor opinion of SD? C'mon. Listen, I had a really bad experience with a particular cat food--after shelling out $1100 to the vet and bringing my cat home after four days in the hospital, do you suppose I would not have some hard feelings about that particular food? If that food happened to be manufactured by Hill's (it wasn't), would the Hills champions on this ng declare that I must have made it all up to support a hate campaign against the company? Apparently you can only zealously promote SD at every opportunity on this newsgroup. You cannot criticize it without these guys going through the roof... K |
#518
|
|||
|
|||
Yngver wrote:
(GAUBSTER2) wrote: From: ospam (Yngver) Posts that are imprecise or leave out details for brevity's sake are not the same as lying, you know. If everyone posting to ngs were perfectly clear and precise each time he/she posted, posts would be so long few people would read them. I agree. She only reaps what she sows. Oh, c'mon now. That's just plain vicious. That's not vicious, that's my opinion and the opinion of others as expressed here lately. You have a weird definition of the term, "vicious". I would actually label some of the things she has said against Phil P as being closer to "vicious". LOL. Oh, sure. Lauren was vicious to Phil P? Right. You must have missed a lot of flame wars in this ng. Lauren hates Hill's and takes every opportunity to bash away even if it means making things up. I don't see evidence of a specific vendetta against Hills. You've absolutely got to be kidding. Vendetta: an often prolonged series of retaliatory, vengeful, or hostile acts or exchange of such acts. You know, I guess you could call me anti-Tender Vittles--I think it's a terrible food--but that's not the same as a vendetta against the mfr. Lauren had a bad experience with SD. Her cat had health problems on it, and her vet advised her to quit feeding it. The cat's health improved, and the vet concluded that SD had been contributing to the problems. It's natural that if a person has a bad experience with a particular food, that she/he will view the food unfavorably. Yet the SD zealots here accuse her of lying and fabrication because she has voiced a poor opinion of SD? C'mon. Listen, I had a really bad experience with a particular cat food--after shelling out $1100 to the vet and bringing my cat home after four days in the hospital, do you suppose I would not have some hard feelings about that particular food? If that food happened to be manufactured by Hill's (it wasn't), would the Hills champions on this ng declare that I must have made it all up to support a hate campaign against the company? Apparently you can only zealously promote SD at every opportunity on this newsgroup. You cannot criticize it without these guys going through the roof... K |
#519
|
|||
|
|||
|
#520
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|