If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#401
|
|||
|
|||
Oh boo hoo Bob. I hardly think posting style is the issue here, but
since you are blindly groping for anything to criticize that would allow you to insult me, then I guess my posting style is as good as anything to attack. I top post because I prefer to read messages that way. I don't need a line by line of everything that I have just gotten through reading. Your posting style of replying at the end irritates me. I spoke rashly when I called you an idiot. What I actually believe is that you are ignorant. Ignorant people hold tenaciously to their beliefs regardless of any logical persuasive argument, and even in the face of compelling evidence that they are wrong, will continue to defend their erroneous beliefs. The idiot is you - and a top-posting one at that, how much lower on the intelligence scale can you get. |
#402
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Brenchley. wrote in message . ..
Abuse Report Filed. To whom? Your mother? Any ISP or moderator isn't going to give a flying **** about some petty complaint about name calling and flame wars. Really, they just don't care. There are no "feelings police" make people be nice to you. Its laughable that you think anyone cares. I hate jumping in on such a stupid post but dear God, you give someone a little access to the internet, and they become complete morons. Bob, I don't know you nor do I care to know you, but you are one of the most amusingly stupid trolls I've had the pleasure to come across in a long time. A hint, you're not so "leet' anymore just because you are aware of the "old" rules for posting in usenet. Like many other things on the internet, netiquette is constantly evolving, and top posting is much more common than replying inline. Like the addition of the word ain't to the dictionary, it may not make the best sense, but it is acceptable. I'm sure you live a miserable small life where no one notices you, which is why you've chosen to be such an obvious thorn in everyone's side, but here is another hint : you still don't matter. Validating your existence through the people you **** off is probably the saddest thing I have seen so far. |
#403
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Brenchley. wrote in message . ..
Abuse Report Filed. To whom? Your mother? Any ISP or moderator isn't going to give a flying **** about some petty complaint about name calling and flame wars. Really, they just don't care. There are no "feelings police" make people be nice to you. Its laughable that you think anyone cares. I hate jumping in on such a stupid post but dear God, you give someone a little access to the internet, and they become complete morons. Bob, I don't know you nor do I care to know you, but you are one of the most amusingly stupid trolls I've had the pleasure to come across in a long time. A hint, you're not so "leet' anymore just because you are aware of the "old" rules for posting in usenet. Like many other things on the internet, netiquette is constantly evolving, and top posting is much more common than replying inline. Like the addition of the word ain't to the dictionary, it may not make the best sense, but it is acceptable. I'm sure you live a miserable small life where no one notices you, which is why you've chosen to be such an obvious thorn in everyone's side, but here is another hint : you still don't matter. Validating your existence through the people you **** off is probably the saddest thing I have seen so far. |
#404
|
|||
|
|||
|
#405
|
|||
|
|||
|
#406
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Brenchley. wrote in message . ..
On 29 Feb 2004 17:01:42 -0800, (Aquagrrl) wrote: Bob, I don't know you nor do I care to know you, but you are one of the most amusingly stupid trolls I've had the pleasure to come across in a long time. A hint, you're not so "leet' anymore just because you are aware of the "old" rules for posting in usenet. Like many other things on the internet, netiquette is constantly evolving, and top posting is much more common than replying inline. Only to ignorant or selfish people. No Bob, you are the selfish, ignorant person. If someone is responding to a particular statement within a posting, then yes, please do quote that statement just above your reply. If you are responding to the entire posting in general, please, please post at the top. It's really stupid to have to scroll though countless lines of the same posting time after time just to get to a one line reply at the damn bottom of all of it. All of you should know by now that Bob Brenchley is a fool and a troll. He is most likly the only person in the world that thinks of him as anything else. Please DO post at the top if you are replying to the entire post and just delete the "old post". That way it saves bandwidth, time, and a lot of unnecessary reading. Thanks, Tim |
#407
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Brenchley. wrote in message . ..
On 29 Feb 2004 17:01:42 -0800, (Aquagrrl) wrote: Bob, I don't know you nor do I care to know you, but you are one of the most amusingly stupid trolls I've had the pleasure to come across in a long time. A hint, you're not so "leet' anymore just because you are aware of the "old" rules for posting in usenet. Like many other things on the internet, netiquette is constantly evolving, and top posting is much more common than replying inline. Only to ignorant or selfish people. No Bob, you are the selfish, ignorant person. If someone is responding to a particular statement within a posting, then yes, please do quote that statement just above your reply. If you are responding to the entire posting in general, please, please post at the top. It's really stupid to have to scroll though countless lines of the same posting time after time just to get to a one line reply at the damn bottom of all of it. All of you should know by now that Bob Brenchley is a fool and a troll. He is most likly the only person in the world that thinks of him as anything else. Please DO post at the top if you are replying to the entire post and just delete the "old post". That way it saves bandwidth, time, and a lot of unnecessary reading. Thanks, Tim |
#408
|
|||
|
|||
Quoth Tropical Tim:
If you are responding to the entire posting in general, please, please post at the top. It's really stupid to have to scroll though countless lines of the same posting time after time just to get to a one line reply at the damn bottom of all of it. It's even more of a pain to scroll through the rest of the message anyway, only to discover that 50 lines of message have been quoted with no attempt to prune for context. It's also a waste of bandwidth (and outside of 10pm til 8am, I pay for mine by the 5k). Please, if you're responding to a message generally, note that all you really need to quote of that message is enough context to let the rest of us know which message you're responding to! After that, whether you're responding at the top or the bottom is insignificant - it just flows more like a conversation if you bottom-post. The old Pnews program used to reject posts if you quoted more text than you originated. Sometimes I miss that. -- Gwenhwyfaer (a plea from the bandwidth-impoverished) some girls wander by themselves |
#409
|
|||
|
|||
Quoth Tropical Tim:
If you are responding to the entire posting in general, please, please post at the top. It's really stupid to have to scroll though countless lines of the same posting time after time just to get to a one line reply at the damn bottom of all of it. It's even more of a pain to scroll through the rest of the message anyway, only to discover that 50 lines of message have been quoted with no attempt to prune for context. It's also a waste of bandwidth (and outside of 10pm til 8am, I pay for mine by the 5k). Please, if you're responding to a message generally, note that all you really need to quote of that message is enough context to let the rest of us know which message you're responding to! After that, whether you're responding at the top or the bottom is insignificant - it just flows more like a conversation if you bottom-post. The old Pnews program used to reject posts if you quoted more text than you originated. Sometimes I miss that. -- Gwenhwyfaer (a plea from the bandwidth-impoverished) some girls wander by themselves |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.pets.cats: Russian Blue Breed-FAQ | Eric Johnson | Cat Information | 0 | November 28th 04 05:16 AM |