A cat forum. CatBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CatBanter forum » Cat Newsgroups » Cat community
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What's in pet food?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old June 16th 11, 11:42 PM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
dh@.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default What's in pet food?

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, Char wrote:

On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, wrote:

On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can,
because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of
livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food:

"It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo

"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo

and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent
what's inside:

cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley,
porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak
florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new
york strip, filet mignon

The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain
animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say
what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him
pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the
cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's
what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion
that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why
rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't
figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than
a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!!
Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL.

Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!!
You can start by not cross posting it. Duh!

There's nothing wrong with cross posting.


There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts.


You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe
that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals
experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so
they are opposed to it. Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve
years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people
that clueless, they should learn the truth already.
  #22  
Old June 17th 11, 01:28 PM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Char
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default What's in pet food?

On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, wrote:

On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, wrote:

On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can,
because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of
livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food:

"It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo

"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo

and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent
what's inside:

cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley,
porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak
florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new
york strip, filet mignon

The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain
animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say
what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him
pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the
cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's
what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion
that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why
rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't
figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than
a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!!
Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL.

Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!!
You can start by not cross posting it. Duh!
There's nothing wrong with cross posting.

There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts.

You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe
that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals
experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so
they are opposed to it.


There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog
food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that
will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and worse!

However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it?

Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve
years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people
that clueless, they should learn the truth already.


Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How
could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you
butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks old.

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?

  #23  
Old June 17th 11, 02:20 PM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Mr.Smartypants
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default What's in pet food?

On Jun 17, 6:28*am, Char wrote:
On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote:





On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, *wrote:


On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, * wrote:


On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza
* *wrote:


* * * Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can,
because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of
livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food:


"It's established: *cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo


"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. *There have been several citations to support this." - Goo


and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent
what's inside:


cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley,
porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak
florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new
york strip, filet mignon


The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain
animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say
what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him
pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the
cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's
what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion
that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why
rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't
figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than
a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!!
Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL.


Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!!
You can start by not cross posting it. Duh!
* * * There's nothing wrong with cross posting.
There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts.

* * *You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe
that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals
experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so
they are opposed to it.


There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog
food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that
will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and worse!

However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it?

* Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve
years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people
that clueless, they should learn the truth already.


Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How
could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you
butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks old.

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?-



We've spent YEARS trying to convince Goobs that NO cows are being
raised for 12 years for the singular purpose of becoming pet food.

Why don't YOU try convincing him? (he's very stupid and an extremely
slow learner)
  #24  
Old June 17th 11, 08:25 PM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Dutch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default What's in pet food?

"Char" wrote

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the
same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so
why do it?


It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound often
enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to him. He's also
working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a bankrupt mind.

  #25  
Old June 18th 11, 01:57 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Char
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default What's in pet food?

On 6/17/2011 9:20 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
On Jun 17, 6:28 am, wrote:
On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote:





On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, wrote:
On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, wrote:
On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote:
Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can,
because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of
livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food:
"It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo
"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo
and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent
what's inside:
cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley,
porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak
florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new
york strip, filet mignon
The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain
animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say
what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him
pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the
cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's
what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion
that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why
rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't
figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than
a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!!
Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL.
Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!!
You can start by not cross posting it. Duh!
There's nothing wrong with cross posting.
There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts.
You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe
that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals
experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so
they are opposed to it.

There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog
food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that
will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and worse!

However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it?

Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve
years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people
that clueless, they should learn the truth already.

Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How
could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you
butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks old.

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?-


We've spent YEARS trying to convince Goobs that NO cows are being
raised for 12 years for the singular purpose of becoming pet food.

Why don't YOU try convincing him? (he's very stupid and an extremely
slow learner)


I have a life, that's why. You should try it sometime. Why do you care
what one person thinks? Does it really matter?

All you are doing is feeding the troll. That's rather stupid.
  #26  
Old June 18th 11, 02:00 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Char
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default What's in pet food?

On 6/17/2011 3:25 PM, Dutch wrote:
"Char" wrote

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?


It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound
often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to
him. He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result
of a bankrupt mind.


So what? Why is it important to worry so much about one person and one
idea? Turn the computer off, go outside and get some fresh air.
  #27  
Old June 18th 11, 02:26 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Dutch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default What's in pet food?



"Char" wrote in message
news
On 6/17/2011 9:20 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
On Jun 17, 6:28 am, wrote:
On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote:





On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400,
wrote:
On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400,
wrote:
On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote:
Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is
what's in the can,
because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and
flocks of
livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used
for pet food:
"It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo
"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo
and so believes labels saying things like the following really do
represent
what's inside:
cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey
medley,
porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye
steak, steak
florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast
turkey, new
york strip, filet mignon
The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he
feels certain
animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much
afraid to say
what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed
it down to him
pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the
labels on the
cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid
to say that's
what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to
the conclusion
that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure
out why
rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he
also can't
figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more
expensive than
a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!!
Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL.
Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!!
You can start by not cross posting it. Duh!
There's nothing wrong with cross posting.
There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts.
You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like
to believe
that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more
animals
experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe
it and so
they are opposed to it.
There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog
food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that
will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and
worse!

However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it?

Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve
years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any
other people
that clueless, they should learn the truth already.
Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How
could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you
butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks
old.

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?-


We've spent YEARS trying to convince Goobs that NO cows are being
raised for 12 years for the singular purpose of becoming pet food.

Why don't YOU try convincing him? (he's very stupid and an extremely
slow learner)


I have a life, that's why. You should try it sometime. Why do you care
what one person thinks? Does it really matter?

All you are doing is feeding the troll. That's rather stupid.


He *is* the troll.


  #28  
Old June 18th 11, 02:27 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Dutch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default What's in pet food?

"Char" wrote in message
news
On 6/17/2011 3:25 PM, Dutch wrote:
"Char" wrote

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?


It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound
often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to him.
He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a
bankrupt mind.


So what? Why is it important to worry so much about one person and one
idea? Turn the computer off, go outside and get some fresh air.


Trying to be annoying to someone is the pinnacle of achievement for him,
don't ask him to give that up!

  #29  
Old June 18th 11, 02:49 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Mr.Smartypants
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default What's in pet food?

On Jun 17, 7:27*pm, "Dutch" wrote:
"Char" wrote in message

news
On 6/17/2011 3:25 PM, Dutch wrote:
"Char" wrote


Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?


It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound
often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to him..
He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a
bankrupt mind.


So what? Why is it important to worry so much about one person and one
idea? Turn the computer off, go outside and get some fresh air.


Trying to be annoying to someone is the pinnacle of achievement for him,
don't ask him to give that up!


While you two goos are on aaev trying to be annoying to *everyone*.

Get Goo to answer Rupert's question if you want to be useful.
  #30  
Old June 18th 11, 09:18 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.health,uk.business.agriculture,sci.agriculture
Dutch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default What's in pet food?



"Mr.Smartypants" wrote in message
...
On Jun 17, 7:27 pm, "Dutch" wrote:
"Char" wrote in message

news
On 6/17/2011 3:25 PM, Dutch wrote:
"Char" wrote


Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?


It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound
often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to
him.
He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a
bankrupt mind.


So what? Why is it important to worry so much about one person and one
idea? Turn the computer off, go outside and get some fresh air.


Trying to be annoying to someone is the pinnacle of achievement for him,
don't ask him to give that up!


While -


While I grow old waiting for you say anything sensible.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kitten food for an 8 month old cat or switch to adult food? mike Cat health & behaviour 3 June 1st 09 12:12 AM
Cat food brands--Science Diet = cat equivalent of rich folk buyingtheir people food at Whole Foods and other boutique grocery stores? mike Cat health & behaviour 9 April 22nd 09 02:05 PM
Making dry food look/smell/taste like wet food Ray Ban Cat health & behaviour 20 October 30th 03 12:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CatBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.