Animal Welfare, or elimination? (was: Douchebag...)

I fixed your subject header, ****wit. In your usual cracKKKer ****wit
manner, you ****ed it up.


****wit David Harrison, cracKKKer liar, lied:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:37:20 -0700, wrote:



****wit David Harrison, cracKKKer liar, lied:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:50:32 -0700, wrote:

****wit David Harrison, cracKKKer liar, lied:

You people refer to appreciating when AW is successful as the
LoL,

That's NOT what it is.

That IS exactly what it is

"appreciating when AW is successful" means being glad when measures like
larger pens or free range results in less suffering for animals

For those of us who are capable of it, which you are not, it means
appreciating less suffering AND lives of positive value among other
things. For
people like you all it means is a delay in total elimination.

You're a moron and a sicko,

Only an eliminationist would consider it "sick" to appreciate when AW is
successful

Meaningless cracKKKer blabber. "when 'AW' [sic] is successful" - the
words are English words, but it's not English.


quit cross-posting your moronic sickness.

Actually, surprisingly,

Getting to experience life is not a benefit to fighting birds or any
other livestock, ****wit.

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:37:20 -0700, "Dutch" wrote:



dh@. wrote in message ...
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:50:32 -0700, "Dutch" wrote:

dh@. wrote

You people refer to appreciating when AW is successful as the
LoL,

That's NOT what it is.

That IS exactly what it is

"appreciating when AW is successful" means being glad when measures like
larger pens or free range results in less suffering for animals

For those of us who are capable of it, which you are not, it means
appreciating less suffering AND lives of positive value among other
things. For
people like you all it means is a delay in total elimination.

You're a moron

You showed yourself the bigger moron by believing in 12 year old pet food
cattle, and by all your dishonesties. You also do it frequently by exposing
yourself as an elimiationist like by claiming to be in favor of AW while you
maniacally oppose appreciation for when it results in lives of positive value
for millions of livestock animals. You also do it by claiming to have unlearned
to have the appreciation you claimed to have developed in the past:



and a sicko,

Only an eliminationist would consider it "sick" to appreciate when AW is
successful, meaning you have revealed yourself yet AGAIN.

quit cross-posting your moronic sickness.

Actually, surprisingly, it's often pet owning enthusiasts who NEED to have
the huge difference between the misnomer and AW pointed out for them. And even
then sometimes they can't learn to appreciate it after is has been. I've seen
people discussing that fact in groups online, and just recently a girl working
in a pet store mentioned that exact same thing. And of course since I saw how
eliminationists contributed to the destruction of a dairy farm--and those cows
didn't even go to become pet food but became fertilizer instead--I know the
distinction between the two is very significant to agriculture too. You have no
valid bitch regarding the groups this information is being presented to, nor
does anyone else.