![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Management Bites Dog Food Factory
A story of management resistance to employee involvement and self-direction by Art Kleiner It started out as an experiment in workplace democracy and set performance records. So why did the bosses want to shut it down? This is the story of an idea so powerful that management couldn't kill it. An idea rooted in a factory that four different companies have owned, enjoyed great results from, and then tried to shut down---only to have the idea bite management back. The idea is self-governing, high-performance teams---the stuff of the now- back-in-vogue socio-technical movement. The place is a dog food plant, where the idea was first tried, flourished, and then went through successive owners who couldn't decide which side of the idea they were on. The story dates back to 1966. One morning, in an isolated warehouse at a Gaines dog food plant in Kankakee, Illinois, a 20-year-old nightshift worker was found bound to a column with packaging tape. He was unhurt, but he couldn't get free. Once discovered, he was immediately cut down. The question was: What to do next? The workers who'd assaulted their colleague couldn't be punished because of union rules. And Lyman Ketchum and Ed Dulworth, the two senior managers in the plant, didn't want to punish them. Labor-management relations were already on the brink of explosion, in part a result of the unexpected success of Gainesburgers, which had pushed the decrepit facility to operate at three-times capacity. Instead of "kicking ass and taking names" as some supervisors suggested, Ketchum and Dulworth opted for a more radical---and more productive---course: a sociotechnical pilot project. The pair took their pitch for the workplace of the future to corporate management. "People have 'ego' needs," Dulworth argued. "They want self- esteem, a sense of accomplishment, autonomy, increasing knowledge and skill, and data on their performance." Their idea: "unlearn" every traditional practice and design a plant from scratch to capitalize on that aspect of human nature. Although decidedly skeptical, a General Foods vice president uttered the fateful words: "Go ahead, you are free to fail." What emerged was an experiment housed in a gleaming white silo-shaped plant on the Kansas prairie in Topeka. Sections of the plant painted in bright colors became natural centers where teams gravitated to compare notes---or to thrash out differences. There were no supervisors, only teams and team members who controlled plant operations. They hired new members, assigned shifts, set hours, and redesigned the placement of machinery. Everyone rotated through a wide variety of jobs. Significantly, they shared freely in information about the plant's finances and cash flow. Without the overhead of middle managers, with an astonishingly low 2% absenteeism rate, and with a level of involvement bordering on ownership, the Topeka plant set performance records at General Foods. It became an example of the next-generation workplace: curious executives and business reporters lined up for tours in such volumes that Dulworth began charging admission. But as the limelight shined brighter, General Foods worried about the glare. Corporate managers withdrew their support and declared the experiment "out of control." Ketchum and Dulworth were unceremoniously pushed out of the company. A new plant manager arrived with his marching orders: "Cut out this missionary crap." Too late. The system had already taken on a life of its own. It seeped into the design of the new canned dog food plant next door. In 1984, General Foods sold its pet food business to the Anderson Clayton conglomerate. In Topeka, the team structure persisted without management cultivation. By 1986, when Quaker Oats bought all of Anderson Clayton, the Gaines dog food plant was the crown jewel of the acquisition. But Quaker made no attempt to extend the Topeka system anywhere else in its organization. Then in March 1995, when Heinz acquired Quaker, it looked as if the new owners might finally put the experiment to sleep. Heinz's initial reaction was to make the plant conform to its policies: management shut down half the plant, eliminated the team system, suspended all the ongoing training that made the team system viable, and cut 150 jobs. But the team-based structure refused to roll over and play dead. During the last six months Heinz has performed a public about-face to broadcast its faith in the Topeka system. Bill Goode, a vice president of human resources and quality for the company, says, "The system in Topeka has evolved to a much higher level than any of our other plants. We look at it as a model of where we'd like to go." Training budgets are back in the 141-person plant; so are team meetings. Safety concerns belong to the shop floor once more. Pay-for-knowledge is intact, people still rotate jobs, and teams determine assignments. This old dog continues to teach management new tricks. Originally printed in the June-July 1996 issue of Fast Company magazine. You may also find Fast Company magazine at http://www.fastcompany.com -- Message posted via http://www.catkb.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.geocities.com/livefromjersey/gaines.html
The Death of Gaines*Burgers? 7/16/00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- So I'm buying private label pet food for work. This is a particularly good market for private label, because you won't experiment with stuff like baby formula and hair coloring, but you'll stick most any ol' chunk of brown in your dog dish. Then I realize it. Like when you realize that your car's not in your parking spot, it took a minute to sink in. I checked the entire aisle, but to no avail. There were no Gaines*Burgers. Those of you without dogs might not know what Gaines*Burgers are. They?re individually wrapped patties of dog food. Each one is a few hundred red and yellow soft rectangular pellets pressed into a hockey puck that you crumble into a dog dish. The dog food smell is now on your hands for the next 36 hours. My old dog Jason ate them for a few years; he wasn't finicky, so his dog food entrees flip-flopped like a fish on a boat. And they're properly spelled with an asterisk in the middle. Gaines*Burgers have a deep significance to me. But not because of Jason. Gaines*Burgers was the first running gag my improv troupe had. It started right before the first ever Mixed Signals show. It was a monologue competition for the campus theater group, and we were the filler material between the monologues and the judges' decision. So we had twenty minutes, a giant theater-savvy audience, and absolutely no previous experience. If we were gonna tank, it would become well known. We were all a bit nervous about going out, so I was joking beforehand that we were going to seed the audience with good suggestions, such as Gaines*Burger. (Improv suggestion note: the best suggestions are anything we haven?t heard before. Every show is guaranteed to have some people yell out ?Lesbians!? or ?Proctologist!? We?ve done lesbian and proctologist scenes to death. There?s only so much original comedy potential to be wrung out of it, and it?s gone in a few performances. Usually the audience likes it, despite us being bored silly on stage by pretending to reach into the posterior of yet another troupe member. What we really like is a suggestion we haven?t done on stage yet, where we can find new things to do with it. Lesbian proctologist people think they're adding to the quality of the show, but they're actually just giving us the routine we hope not to repeat.) Hence why I said Gaines*Burger. Being the first show, there was still vast uncharted territory for us to explore with proctology, but something like a Gaines*Burger would guaranteed be a change of pace. Overhearing me that day was Craig Whyte. He decided to take my suggestion to heart. During the Noun Game, where stop the scene occasionally to get random nouns to work into the scene, Craig yelled out ?Gaines*Burger.? And it worked. I can't remember for the life of me what the scene was, but I'm almost positive I was in it, and definitely positive that Gaines*Burger worked. Then we got a real show, also attended by Craig. Another Gaines*Burger shout. At our second real show, a third serving of Gaines*Burger. And then the snowball was pushed downhill. During practices, we began throwing Gaines*Burger suggestions out like Met fans throwing batteries. Craig Whyte dutifully shouted out Gaines*Burger at every show he could. Craig and I began a yet-unfinished debate about which one of us actually likes Gaines*Burgers and which one is just humoring the other guy. It got to a high point where Jeff bought a big box of Gaines*Burgers. OK, now he was stuck with four pounds of pungent dog food. It instantly turned bad when the thin cardboard box turned into a burgerlanche in a crowded back seat coming back from a movie. It wasn't as bad as it sounds; 23 of the 24 burgers stayed intact, and it wasn't my car. We gave them out as prizes for volunteering at improv shows, but somehow most of them were left on the chairs at the end of the show, and went back in the box. Jeff ended up hiding them in the room of his floormate, who three years later is possibly still looking for some. And then it stopped. Like a pop song, one day it stopped being played and no one noticed. We knew each other a lot better, so the in-jokes focused more on everyone's personal foibles and flaws. Mine (that they've realized) is wildly flailing arms during a performance. I attribute it to wanting to use the stage space. The new people in the troupe probably don?t even know we ever had a Gaines*Burger thing. And now, Gaines*Burgers were no more. I was to plenty of stores in multiple states, and not a *Burger in sight. This was like coming back from a three week vacation and remembering you had a cat. I tried pets.com. The site was down. I tried petstore.com. It had just recently merged with pets.com, which it took me to, which was still down. I tried adding .com any and all permutations of Gaines*Burger, with every symbol above the number keys available on my keyboard. Gaines.com was a real site, but just some herbal remedy company. Oddly, they had a pet products section, with a vast quantity of stuff with names like Barley Cat, Canine Support (For Dogs Under Stress) and Female Hypersexuality Homeopathic Pet Formula, which I think was on Showtime at 3 a.m. last week. I had one possibility left, a caving friend in the pet store business. I asked him if Gaines*Burgers were still around. "Yes, but don't buy them! They're just junk food for dogs." he shot back instantly. Success! They still existed! And ... they were horrible. He explained it: Gaines*Burgers are made with mostly filler material, the stuff in baloney besides hoof and snout meat. All the nutritional value of marshmellow fluff. A lot of canned dog food has horse meat and by products, but it's better than empty calories. Pet stores pretty much refuse to carry them, and some supermarkets as well. I can vouch for other brands of crumbly burger food existing on supermarket shelves, both national brands and private label, but not a Gaines*Burger in sight. And maybe that's a good thing. Gaines*Burgers are now evil to me. I don't have a dog now, so all this information really does is be a killjoy to my earlier memories, and to wonder if Jason wasn't getting a nice shiny coat for a reason. It's mixed in with all the other forgotten catch phrases, the Don't Have a Cow Mans and Whatcho Talkin' Bout Willises and the soon to be forgotten Is That Your Final Answer? So the next time you're in an improv audience and someone asked for a suggestion, shout out Gaines*Burger for old time's sake. Unless it's Mixed Signals; I can't tell you how many times we've had lesbian proctologists eating them. -- Message posted via http://www.catkb.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:38:19 GMT, "Gainsburger via CatKB.com"
wrote: During the last six months Heinz has performed a public about-face to broadcast its faith in the Topeka system. Bill Goode, a vice president of human resources and quality for the company, says, "The system in Topeka has evolved to a much higher level than any of our other plants. We look at it as a model of where we'd like to go." Update: The Topeka plant is now owned by Del Monte. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gainsburger via CatKB.com wrote: Management Bites Dog Food Factory A story of management resistance to employee involvement and self-direction by Art Kleiner It started out as an experiment in workplace democracy and set performance records. So why did the bosses want to shut it down? This is the story of an idea so powerful that management couldn't kill it. An idea rooted in a factory that four different companies have owned, enjoyed great results from, and then tried to shut down---only to have the idea bite management back. The idea is self-governing, high-performance teams---the stuff of the now- back-in-vogue socio-technical movement. The place is a dog food plant, where the idea was first tried, flourished, and then went through successive owners who couldn't decide which side of the idea they were on. The story dates back to 1966. One morning, in an isolated warehouse at a Gaines dog food plant in Kankakee, Illinois, a 20-year-old nightshift worker was found bound to a column with packaging tape. He was unhurt, but he couldn't get free. Once discovered, he was immediately cut down. The question was: What to do next? The workers who'd assaulted their colleague couldn't be punished because of union rules. And Lyman Ketchum and Ed Dulworth, the two senior managers in the plant, didn't want to punish them. Labor-management relations were already on the brink of explosion, in part a result of the unexpected success of Gainesburgers, which had pushed the decrepit facility to operate at three-times capacity. Instead of "kicking ass and taking names" as some supervisors suggested, Ketchum and Dulworth opted for a more radical---and more productive---course: a sociotechnical pilot project. I know this plant. The workers used to grab stray dogs and throw them into the meat grinders, alive, for fun. And I suspect the guy tied to the post was black, the perps, white. Not a pretty place, what-so-ever... -L. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can Cats Eat Dog Food? | JHBennett | Cat anecdotes | 31 | January 29th 05 10:42 AM |
Food Question | Christina | Cat health & behaviour | 555 | February 16th 04 05:34 PM |
feed Nutro? | Tamara | Cat health & behaviour | 90 | November 19th 03 01:57 AM |
Reply for Phil | -L. | Cat health & behaviour | 8 | October 23rd 03 12:30 PM |
Feeding dilemma | Yoj | Cat anecdotes | 11 | August 24th 03 11:48 PM |